Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Churches combining in chch?

I read  Martin van Beynens's thoughts on the rebuilding of Christchurches places of worship and making one place for all churches to gather while using ther est of the insurance monies on the poor.

Apart from the fact that insurance payouts are going to be earmarked for rebuilding and using it fior other purposes will be  a legal nightmare....  these are my thoughts on the article.

As I considered what he had written three things sprang immediately to mind.  The first was scripture.   Mark 14:7.  Jesus says that we will always have the poor with us.  I use this to point out that we should never cease working with, helping and showing the love of God to those considered poor.  Furthermore, Jesus came to preach good news to the poor. I guess the poor were uppermost in his mind as they are mentioned first in that passage.   I am not in anyway discounting the poor, and outreach and social justice that is utterly essential for the church to be involved with in the rest of what I have to say.

Martins idea is just not gonna work! no way no how.

I've been around various different denominations over the years and I have heard jokes about *Baptist Time*, *Presbyterian Time*, *Methodist Time* to name just three **smiles**. The punch line of these jokes often points out how long it takes to get anything done - and that getting used to a looooong wait before anything occurs is normative.  Another joke runs along the lines of *Get two church members together and you have a committeee*

Speaking from the position of a long wait and being on committees that were there mainly to get things done that took a hang of a lot more time and frankly meetings than expected....   I looked at the idea of a pile of churches under the one roof and wondered in my cynical manner how long the commitee would take to decide who would pay the power bill!

Martins comments that all building individual churches will do is cement differences and take up space seemed as cynical as my own thoughts.  I have 9 children.  Some of them can share a room with their siblings without the bickering and tensions soaring through the roof,  others - well its not worth going there.

I think that stuffing all denominations and religious persuations under the same roof ( share a bedroom guys - no fighting or you wont get desert tomorrow night LEAVE your sisters teddybear ALONE!!!!) is only going to exasperate and highlight the many differences that have resulted in the denominations being individual.

Now I know that there are ministers fraternals that cross denominations that are working really well - and I am really gratified when I hear of interchurch projects that work well.   Yet I can't imagine the personalities involved in a mega place of worship remaining amicable over time.

Can you?

1 comment:

  1. Hi Paulette,

    Thanks for such a practical approach to Van Beyens proposal. It is easy to get carried away with the theological debate around this idea, which you have pointed out is further than we will ever get. Do you think though that because it would be difficult that it shouldn't be attempted? Your thoughts?

    ReplyDelete